When trust is the product, not the tagline

Turning brief encounters into lasting connections

A mobile e-commerce UX for an ethical pet cosmetics brand, redesigned to reduce purchase hesitation without discounts, dark patterns, or false urgency.
Role

UX Lead

Role

UX Lead

Industry

Consumer E-commerce

Industry

Consumer E-commerce

Scope

Mobile UX · Research · Flows

Scope

Mobile UX · Research · Flows

Focus

Conversion · Retention

Focus

Conversion · Retention

[ Brief ]

Lapunzel is an ethical pet cosmetics brand: vegan ingredients, premium pricing, mobile-first. The product was real and well-made. The problem was the UX made it feel risky to buy. Our job: make the purchase feel as safe as the product actually is.

4

Design decisions

0

Discounts used

+100%

Purchase confidence
[ Real Problem ]

High intent. Low purchase completion.

Users were coming in ready to buy, and leaving without doing it. Not because of price. Because the experience felt uncertain.

Discovery confusion

Users couldn't quickly tell which product was right for their pet's needs.

Discovery confusion

Users couldn't quickly tell which product was right for their pet's needs.

Trust gap at checkout

New brand + premium price = hesitation. No signals of credibility at the right moment.

Trust gap at checkout

New brand + premium price = hesitation. No signals of credibility at the right moment.

Price without context

Higher price felt unjustified — not because users were cheap, but because value wasn't visible.

Price without context

Higher price felt unjustified — not because users were cheap, but because value wasn't visible.
[ Hypothesis ]

Trust is a UX feature, not a marketing claim.

Research showed that users didn't need to be convinced, they needed to be reassured. At the right moment. In the right place. Through interface decisions, not copy.

[ Decision 1 ]

Trust as a UX feature (not marketing)

Users hesitated to buy from a new, unfamiliar brand, especially at a higher price point.

Embed trust signals into product and purchase flows — vet-approved tags, photo/video reviews, real-time availability.

Trust was built at the exact moment users needed reassurance — not hidden on an About page.

[ Decision 2 ]

Categories based on user intent

Generic categories (Fur, Eyes, Ears) caused confusion — users didn't think in anatomy, they thought in outcomes.

Renamed categories from anatomical logic to usage logic: Shampoos and Conditioners, Balms and Soaps, Tonics and Foams.

Recognition-first navigation led to faster, more confident product decisions.

[ Decision 3 ]

Explain value instead of defending price

Higher pricing raised skepticism — not because users were price-sensitive, but because value was nowhere visible in the flow.

Make value scannable — ingredients, origin, purpose. Link educational blog content directly to relevant products.

When users understand why something costs more, price becomes secondary to confidence.

[ Decision 4 ]

Design for retention, not just conversion

Product choice no longer required guesswork. Navigation reflected how users actually think.

Trust was built at the exact moment users decided to buy, not on an About page no one reads.

The experience prepared users to return — without feeling pushed.

[ Outcome ]

From "Should I trust this?" to "This makes sense."

Product choice no longer required guesswork — navigation reflected how users actually think.

Trust was built at the exact moment users decided to buy — not on an About page no one reads.

Value was understood before price was questioned — the UX did the work that discounts usually do.

[ Reflection ]

"Trust in e-commerce is built through UX details, not claims."

Clear value explanation outperforms discounts. Recognition-first navigation enables faster, more confident decisions. The biggest design win isn't making something pretty, it's removing the reason someone hesitates.